Published online: 22 Aug, 2013
Author: Hemant Ojha
DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2013.823879
Abstract:
Confronting hegemonic power in the policy process remains a formidable challenge. Critical inquiry and civic resistance have been seen as two possible solutions to address this challenge. However, how and to what extent critical inquiry tackles this challenge is rarely explored. This article outlines a Critical Action Research (CAR) approach and then discusses how this approach was put into practice in Nepal’s forest policy processes during 2000–11. It demonstrates the potential and limitations of a civil-society-based critical inquiry in the context of a centralized system of forest governance facing pressures for participatory reform. This use of a CAR approach aimed to tackle three forms of power – that exercised by the state forest authority; that of the international development agencies; and that of the national political decision-makers – in Nepal’s forest policy processes. Finally, the article identifies theoretical and methodological issues that were demonstrated in this engagement with the policy process.
Keywords: public policy; critical action research; deliberation; forest governance; critical social theory; Nepal
Available at:Here
